2 thoughts on “Apple iPhone 16e Review: Not quite worth it

  1. You’ll probably buy a case, so buy an inexpensive MagSafe case and then you can use MagSafe charging (if you must, but plugging in a cable is more efficient) rather than relying on physical alignment with a wireless charger, and it also takes care of attaching to a stand or bracket for StandBy or Continuity Camera (etc) purposes.

    I think the difference between $999 and $1399 is more significant than Alex does. Sure, if you’re happy to spend $1400 on a phone, then yes, go ahead and buy a 16. But if you’re feeling financially constrained and a four-figure price tag is a hard no, the 16e gives you access to the latest software features plus the great integration between iOS, iPadOS and macOS.

    Sure, the 16e would be better value at $799 or $899 – but everything would be better value at 80 or 90 percent of its actual price.

    What is going to be interesting is whether all/most future iPhone generations include an e variant, or will the e models follow the SE cadence? I bought a 16e assuming the latter, but time will tell.

    1. You could buy a case with magnetic alignment and get that benefit — but it’d still only be at 7.5W, not the 15W that MagSafe/Qi2 supports on the iPhone 16.

      You’re not wrong that anything cheaper is going to be better value, that’s mathematically consistent — but I still stand by the thought that anyone spending $999 on a phone isn’t making as big a leap to the higher price as it is getting to that one grand in the first place. It’s only $1 off a four figure price tag, where the SE phones were a fair distance from it.

      Also going to be interesting in about six months when the iPhone 17 phones arrive, because if the iPhone 16 hangs around in Apple’s lineup (or if there’s just older stock at other retailers) that gap between the 16e and 16 will become much smaller as retailers sell off iPhone 16 models at a discount.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *