Is this a genius rebranding step, or the final push of the handcart over the cliff? (Spoiler: Almost certainly not the first thing).
It’s being widely reported that Elon Musk will at some point today (or tomorrow, because US times are like that when you’re based in Australia) rebrand Twitter as “X”.
Musk already owns the x.com domain and at the time of writing, it’s already redirecting to the Twitter.com domain, and he’s tweeted about it, as has freshly minted Twitter CEO… sorry, X CEO, I guess? — Linda Yaccarino.
Right now, I’m running AlexReviewsTech without Google Ads at all.
Why? Most people complain about them a lot, and I can see why — they can often be intrusive or irrelevant, and they get between you and the content you’d like to enjoy in the first place.
The problem is… that limits the income for the site, which makes it harder to run (servers cost money) and harder to justify (I like to eat food… sometimes!)
That’s why I’m instead seeking reader assistance to keep AlexReviewsTech viable, primarily via Ko-Fi donations.
Don’t want to make a Ko-Fi donation? There are other ways you can support AlexReviewsTech — read about them here!
I feel the urge to quote her statement in full, because oh boy, it’s a lot to take in.
X is the future state of unlimited interactivity – centered in audio, video, messaging, payments/banking – creating a global marketplace for ideas, goods, services, and opportunities.
Powered by AI, X will connect us all in ways we’re just beginning to imagine. For years, fans and critics alike have pushed Twitter to dream bigger, to innovate faster, and to fulfill our great potential. X will do that and more. We’ve already started to see X take shape over the past 8 months through our rapid feature launches, but we’re just getting started.
There’s absolutely no limit to this transformation. X will be the platform that can deliver, well….everything.
Somebody, I fear, has never heard about overpromising.
The big question here is of course, does this really matter?
Twitter has — and even Mr Musk has stated this — shed advertisers and revenue at a frightening rate since his takeover, while also introducing steps that make it a considerably less flexible platform to use if you’re not willing to pay for a Twitter Blue Tick. It’s his platform, purchased at considerable expense, and he can do with it what he likes, naturally enough.
Still, Twitter almost came close in social media to what Google’s achieved in search, becoming the effective byword for social media. Almost… but not quite. Dropping the entire brand is a bold move in itself, because it burns a lot of recognition.
People know Twitter, while saying you’re going X has, well… other connotations to it. Maybe that’s just Elon once again trying to be edgy, but is being edgy with billions of dollars really a worthwhile endeavour?
Oh, wait, Elon’s ego. That’s the primary driver here, how could I forget that?
Twitter is also undeniably less relevant than it was a year ago, or even several years ago. It’s hard to imagine something like the Arab Spring taking place on Twitter/X now, with social media audiences fragmenting across platforms such as Threads, BlueSky, Mastodon et al, while Twitter seems to just hang on by pure dint of the size of the audience it once had.
I dip my toes back into Twitter fairly infrequently these days, mostly to promote my own work, and while I wouldn’t call it a ghost town just yet, the quality of what’s going through its algorithm is… not good.
Although at least I guess he’s already got the theme tune sorted. I wonder how much the licensing is going to cost him? Probably less than Twitter did.
AlexReviewsTech is (for the moment) running ad-free.
This is done via the generosity of folks like you who cover the difference between having on-site ads (with their intrusivenes, flashy images, interstitials, all that bad stuff) by making a one-off or regular sponsorship donation. Something’s got to keep the server spinning up.
So if you’ve found what you’ve read valuable, and you’d like AlexReviewsTech to stay ad-free, please consider making a one-off (or recurring) donation.
If everyone gave just a little, the ads would never need to return — and I would be able to bring you even more ethically-produced tech journalism.
I’d like that, and I think you would too.