The hardware in the Google TV Streamer is an improvement over older Chromecast models, but the new design and higher price may be an issue for some users.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Faster response and app loading times | Much more expensive than older Chromecasts |
| Redesigned remote with larger buttons | Changed remote layout takes some getting used to |
| Remote finding button is quite handy | Larger size makes it much less portable |
Score: 3/5
In this review
Google TV Streamer Specifications
Google TV Streamer Design
Google TV Streamer Camera
Google TV Streamer Performance
Google TV Streamer Battery
Google TV Streamer Conclusion
Support Alex Reviews Tech
Alex Reviews Tech is an independent, ethically run tech reviews site, and it needs your help to keep going. Support independent media by becoming a sponsor through Patreon, Ko-Fi or Paypal! (Spoiler: If enough folks do this, I'll be able to get rid of the ads)
Donate via PayPal
Find out more about how you can support Alex Reviews Tech here.
When Google announced that it was discontinuing the Google Chromecast, it’s safe to say that I was not happy.
The Chromecast line heads to the ever-expanding Google Graveyard to make way for the Google TV Streamer, intended to be its improved replacement.
In a number of ways that’s true, and what Google has made here sits as a decent competitor to the likes of the Apple TV or Nvidia Shield TV – not that Nvidia’s take on an Android TV set top box has seen an update in a long, long time.
If you just want an at-home streaming set top box, it’s a very good option, but the higher price and lower portability are issues that Google could have handled a lot better, if only by the simple process of keeping the cheaper Chromecast in its streaming lineup.
Design
Google’s design aesthetic for the Chromecast was always kind of… blobby for want of a better word, but this largely didn’t matter when you were talking about an HDMI-connected dongle that you typically whacked around the back of the TV (or maybe at the side), because you weren’t looking at it all that much.
The Google TV Streamer is different, because it’s a much larger wedge shaped box that slopes down… because it does. There’s no lights on the front or any design aesthetic reason that I can see for the shape Google has chosen, but if you buy one you’ll want to find somewhere to put it where it’s just a tad more accessible than a Chromecast would be.
That’s because the one feature that Google’s baked into the Google TV Streamer that’s a definite upgrade is the inclusion of a remote finding button.
I can’t say how many times I’ve lost the Chromecast remote in the sofa, because non-imaginary numbers don’t actually go up that high*, so having the ability to press a button and make it chirp until it’s found is quite welcome.
The larger size does make the Google TV Streamer a fair degree less portable than the classic Chromecast, a significant factor if you're travelling, but it's also going to be hard to hide, because unlike the dongle style of the older device, for most TVs it's going to be harder to hide the USB-C charging cable or HDMI cable. Where the older Chromecast had its own HDMI plug, because it was part of the Chromecast itself, here you'l need to supply your own cable to get the Google TV Streamer plugged in.
The other new cable that might be part of your mix is via the inclusion of a gigabit Ethernet port if your streaming runs more to physical cables than Wi-Fi. For that I can accept a larger size and shape, though I still feel like you wouldn’t have had to do that much more to the Chromecast shape for the same end effect.
The included remote control definitely has a little Chromecast DNA in it, but Google’s given it a few growth hormones in its labs. It’s much larger (and should, you’d think, be less easily lost in the sofa, but no…) with the volume controls now having pride of place on the front of the remote.
Bigger, more customisable... but it's still capable of hiding in the sofa. This I have tested extensively.
Google’s also added a customisable button near the bottom of the remote control that can launch Google Home activites, switch TV inputs or launch a specific app shortcut of your choice. I love that this exists, though I do kind of wish that the two buttons above it for YouTube and Netflix were equally customisable.
Nothing against those services, but it’d be great to have full control of my remote and not have parts of it sold off to different concerns, which is 100% what happens with these kinds of branded remote buttons.
One complaint I will make against the Google TV Streamer remote is that while it’s similar to the older Chromecast TV remote, its layout is different with the same sized buttons, which means that my muscle memory is all over the place if I’m trying to make changes on the fly.
If you’re coming from that older model, be ready for a rather steep learning curve, especially around where the home button now sits.
Performance
Setup of the Google TV Streamer is via the Google Home app, and here during my own setup I hit a rather unusual quirk. As it sits as part of Google’s wider hardware ecosystem, I had the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold ready and waiting to handle its setup. Keeping matters in-house would be the easiest way, right?
Not this time it wasn’t.
The Pixel 9 Pro Fold’s Google Home app could see the Google TV Streamer, and it wanted to hook it up to my home Wi-Fi, but every single time it tried that step, it failed, over and over again. I started to wonder if I perhaps had a faulty unit, so I grabbed the nearest other smartphone with Google Home installed to see if it would behave any better.
The nearest other smartphone with Google Home installed was the iPhone 16 Pro Max.
What’s more it worked without a hitch. It’s a truly weird day when the Google app on an iPhone works better with Google hardware than the Google App on the Google Phone… but that’s how it went for setup.
Also read:
Pixel 9 Pro Fold Review
From an interface perspective, there’s very little that will appear different between the older Chromecast devices and the Google TV Streamer, and that’s because they’re both using the Android TV OS, with an interface that mixes between top picks and app selections as well as Movies and TV shows to buy or rent, plus your own library of whatever content you’ve already purchased from Google. While it no longer bears Chromecast branding, casting is also still built in, so you can ping content from phones, tablets and laptops as well.
All of which works fine, and just a smidge faster than on the older 4K Google Chromecast with Google TV device; putting the two side by side saw only a small increase in navigation speed, but the jump in speed for app launching was quite noticeable on the newer Google TV Streamer over the older Chromecast.
While it may not matter for too many users right now, the Google TV Streamer is also Matter certified and can act as a Thread Border Router for compatible smart home devices.
I haven’t yet done extensive testing in that space, though I did try using Google Home directly through the Google TV Streamer, finding that while it worked, at least on first setup it took some time to
actually spot other smart home devices, even Google ones.
Google TV Streamer: Alex’s Verdict
Is the Google TV Streamer a better overall streaming set top box than the Chromecast devices it’s replacing in Google’s lineup?
Technically, yes; it’s a little faster in operation, it’s more flexible with options for Ethernet as well as Wi-Fi and the redesigned remote control is more customisable and easier to use, even if it’s also still just as easy to lose in my sofa. Maybe I have a Sofa of Holding?
However, Google giveth and Google taketh away, because it’s also markedly more expensive at $159.99, and for a lot of users the older Google Chromecast with Google TV would be entirely sufficient for their needs, but Google isn’t opting to continue selling that model.
As I write this the older Chromecast is still available from Google’s Australian store, but that’ll be on a “while stocks last” basis, because it’s already stopped manufacturing new ones.
That leaves the low-cost sub-$100 market to Amazon with its Fire TV sticks, or to an extent to Hubbl with its Hubbl puck device.
It’s a pity, I think, that Google’s abandoning that part of the streaming TV space, because while the Google TV Streamer is a better device than the Chromecast, it’s not some super reimagining of what it can do – it’s just a bit better, that’s all.
Google TV Streamer: Pricing and availability
The Google TV Streamer retails in Australia for $159.99.
The model tested was supplied to me by Google Australia for the purposes of review.
Was this review useful to you? Support independent media by dropping a dollar or two in the tip jar below!
IMBZBK 3 Pack Screen Protector for Samsung Galaxy S25 Tempered Glass 3 Pack Camera Lens Protector Accessories, Case Friendly, Support Fingerprint Reader
$11.04 (as of February 17, 2025 18:40 GMT +11:00 - More infoProduct prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on [relevant Amazon Site(s), as applicable] at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.)
JETech Screen Protector for iPhone 16 Pro 6.3-Inch, Tempered Glass Film with Easy Installation Tool, Case-Friendly, HD Clear, 3-Pack
$10.19 (as of February 17, 2025 18:40 GMT +11:00 - More infoProduct prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on [relevant Amazon Site(s), as applicable] at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.)
4 Pack for Apple Airtag Holder,Waterproof AirTags Case Keychain,with Soft Silicone Holder Key Ring,Lightweight, Anti-Scratch,Full-Body Shockproof Air Tag Holder for Luggage,Keys, Dog Collar
$10.87 (as of February 17, 2025 18:40 GMT +11:00 - More infoProduct prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on [relevant Amazon Site(s), as applicable] at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.)
JETech Slim Fit Case for Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra 5G, Camera Lens Full Protection, Soft TPU Thin Protective Phone Cover with Matte Finish, Shockproof (Titanium Black)
$14.99 (as of February 17, 2025 18:40 GMT +11:00 - More infoProduct prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on [relevant Amazon Site(s), as applicable] at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.)
LENCENT Universal Travel Adapter, International Charger with 3 USB Ports and Type-C PD Fast Charging Adaptor for iPhone, Tablet, Gopro. for Over 200 Countries Type A/C/G/I (USA, Japan, UK, EU, AUS)
$27.14 (as of February 17, 2025 18:40 GMT +11:00 - More infoProduct prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on [relevant Amazon Site(s), as applicable] at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.)Citation from a suitably qualified mathematician needed; Alex may be exaggerating how often he loses the Chromecast remote in his sofa. Or possibly not.
Was this useful to you?
If so, please consider becoming a Patreon, Ko-Fi or Paypal supporter Alex here (again).
I feel strongly that independent tech media is a needed resource to help people make smarter tech buying decisions -- and I also very much like to help people use that tech once they've got it.
This is what I do, but I can't do it without your support.
If this article has helped you out (or you've just enjoyed it), please consider helping support what I do by becoming a sponsor today!
Become an ART Patron
Donate via PayPal
Find out more about how you can support Alex Reviews Tech here.
It’s not clear to me – does the Streamer still offer Chromecast capability ? Can I cast to it from another device ?
And that’s because I made the (incorrect) assumption that people would already know this — which is totally my fault. I’ve amended the review, but yes, it’s entirely Cast compatible from devices that can do that. Think of it like a BIG chromecast in that capacity.
Google 4K streamer is not supported by Foxtel Android TV 13 and with no indication when this will be rectified by Foxtel.
Not particularly surprising — the same situation happened for a long while with the similarly Android based NVIDIA Shield TV. Foxtel’s far more interested in having consumers in that market niche on Binge/Kayo/etc subscriptions.